i love the page so far. i do not want any of the cantent to be destroyed. my issue is i would like more references in the artical. if there all listed at the bottom then id like more for for seperate entries. but if know one knows how ill just sit back for 6 months and not take part in this wikia like i did when i first joined from july to january. Promethius20 (talk) 23:11, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

There's no worry as to whether or not this page's content will be destroyed or will survive, at least not as far as I'm aware. The page has 59 sources, so I think we're fine on that. Are you suggesting that this page be split up into shorter articles? I'd be open to suggestions regarding perhaps adding a page breakpoint around the 13th Century or thereabouts. Radagast83 (talk) 09:06, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

I would like this page to become 2 pages instead of one. Edit

I would like to see Two atricals instead of one here. difining where to make the split is very important it should be the halfway point roughly. if the halfway of the events is where you sugested then that works well. my problem with references was a specific kind of references. for instance the Babylon 5 only events like the evolution of alien races or when they had exspansion or other events no known about in the real world i liked all of that your team has done a spendid job on thos references. my contention is with the events of the real world (our own universe ) the ones i can find when im reading a actual encyclipedia. forinstance when it talks about Space exsploration ,sputnix ,yuri gargarian , neil armstrong and the international space station. where were the references to thos actual events? these are just my thoughts on the matter you was wanting me to clarify the mater so i gave my input. Promethius20 (talk) 16:34, February 11, 2013 (UTC)