Sorry, but I really don't think this is canon. There's just too much fluff in the security manual to take anything like this at face value. Blind Wolf 03:43, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Well it is listed as a canon source, and the name isn't an injoke or a reference to a non-canon book as parts of the security manual does describe. I don't think it should deleted. --Farragut79 03:51, February 27, 2011 (UTC)