FANDOM


This Artical needs to be more encyclopedic Edit

Whats the deal with this Artical? it seems useless in its present form. it seems more like a wikipedia topic. this artical could be made more encyclopedic if it mentioned specific kinds of missiles. i would do so but unfortunatly i do not own any Babylon 5 tech manuals so i am unable to add more babylon 5 related information about babylon 5 missile weapons. although from what little i read so far on this artical these missiles are basically like the photon torpedos of star trek. im not going to boter to edit this artical becasue its not in my area of exspertise but i wanted to point out today that its a stub and does not seem to relate to Babylon 5. the artical should either be exspanded ,merged or deleted in its present form the artical is Un-enclyclopedic. Promethius20 (talk) 23:48, January 21, 2013 (UTC)

A missile is basiclly a missile! they are not photon torpedoes (which use ANTI-MATTER), but missiles! There are no super missiles,but just upgraded versions of normal terrestrial missiles used by current standards.Define your points,it is very clear. Look at the episode of where they bomb Mars. You see the missiles as NORMAL GUIDED CONVENTIONAL EXPLOSIVE MISSILES!!!The page is fine as it is. Entilzha66 (talk) 18:13, January 22, 2013 (UTC)

The page is not fine the way it is your missing the point the point is this page should list all known types of Specific missiles. the artical is way too stubby. Photon torpedos was just a example i used. i never heard of them being mentioned on the show or know if they exsit in the B5 universe. besides who is to say if theres not conventional photon torpedos that dont use anti-mater. im not saying to include photon torpedos as a type of missile unless they exsit in the B5 universe. i would find it impossibly hard to beilve if no specific types of missiles were ever mentioned in the show Promethius20 (talk) 07:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)


I would certainly not go as far to say that it's not encyclopedic, though I'm sure some definite improvement could occur here. On a side note, please also make sure to keep the articles themselves "in-universe", with the notes section serving as a place to refer to the show itself. Thanks! Radagast83 (talk) 09:21, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.